DIMENSIONS OF A REPLY

There are many possible replies to this material. It is not a matter of simply reducing any reply to considering the truth and falsity of any assertions about Sai Baba. The mode, manner, presentation and supporting evidence (and the lack of same) also ought be taken into consideration. The reply may also take into consideration communication and modes of conveying experience. How is the Truth communicated in ways that is verified in the life of the listener, the reader? These and other issues form some of the dimensions of reply.

FIRST: WHAT IS IT YOU VALUE IN SAI BABA?


The value of being confronted with a document of that sort is that it makes you think twice about your spiritual path, where you want to go, and how. You have to analyse what is it that you value in Sai Baba, what it is you have faith in, what validating experiences of that faith form your foundation and how you experience divinity. How do you continue to experience divinity?

WHO IS SATHYA SAI BABA?

We shall examine these facets of a Guru, as we would examine any other matter, using discimination.

To break momentarily and examine GURU, a word which has the following meanings and associations (not from Sai Literature):



It would seem fair to assert that Sathya Sai Baba foots the bill as a guru simply in the function of teacher. The teaching period commenced from the opening of the Prasanthi Nilayam mandir, 23 November 1950.

Sathya Sai Baba has stated that he does not want devotion to himself or his person, what he wants is devotion to his teachings.

There are four stated components of the mission of Sathya Sai Baba, three of which are relevant to the assessment of Sai Baba as GURU and the quality of the teachings. They are These three components of the mission give rise to private talks, discourses, writings, interviews and guidance to devotees from all religious faiths and walks of life. The quality of the teachings is heightened by "sarva dharma", that is to say, the teachings are not limited to Hinduism or Sanathana Dharma - the eternal righteousness that forms the core of Hinduism. It is a multi faith teaching that asserts without fear or favour that all faiths are pathways to the One True God. Festivals and Feast days of other religious traditions are observed; Buddha Wesak, Christmas, The Birthday of Mohammed, the Chinese New Year with Chinese Gods are also observed.

What does The Findings have to assert about 50 years of continuous teaching of this indisputable human truth that all religions are paths to the same goal?

Does The Findings dispute this?

If not, is there due and proper cause then, to depart from the Teachings of Sai Baba?

In the West there is a little remarked upon aspect of Sai Baba's mission, that is, the fostering of the Vedas and fostering of the Vedic scholars. It is generally regarded to be irrelevant in the Western world, which has been endowed with knowledge of the One God. The obscure byways of the Indian scriptures don't seem to apply. The problem with this is that the entire universe rests upon Dharma, that is, right conduct, right action and righteousness. Dharma is something of a catch-all word that does not translate precisely into English. Dharma is the life breath of all the Indian scriptures.

The principle of the Avatar and the principle of all human righteousness, as stated by Sage Vyassa and Sai Baba is

"Sathyam Vada, dharmam chara"

This translates to Speak truthfully, act righteously

The Goal of Life

We commenced this page by indicating dimensions of reply and by saying that
1